Novel model illustrates the finer details of nuclear fission

May 2, 2016
Snapshots of the total density profile of the 240Pu fission process.

For nearly 80 years, nuclear fission has awaited a description within a microscopic framework. In the first study of its kind, scientists collaborating from the University of Washington, Warsaw University of Technology (Poland), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and Los Alamos National Laboratory, developed a novel model to take a more intricate look at what happens during the last stages of the fission process. Using the model, they determined that fission fragments remain connected far longer than expected before the daughter nuclei split apart. Moreover, they noted the predicted kinetic energy agreed with results from experimental observations. This discovery indicates that complex calculations of real-time fission dynamics without physical restrictions are feasible and opens a pathway to a theoretical microscopic framework with abundant predictive power.

In addition to its publication, "Induced Fission of 240Pu Within a Real-time Microscopic Framework" was highlighted as an Editors' Suggestion by Physical Review Letters—ranked first among physics and mathematics journals by the Google Scholar five-year h-index. Only about one letter in six is highlighted based on its particular importance, innovation, and broad appeal.

Apart from its fundamental significance in theoretical physics, providing a usable capability that can accurately model dynamics will impact research areas such as future reactor fuel compositions, nuclear forensics, and studies of nuclear reactions. Excitation energies of fission fragments are not directly accessible by experiments but are crucial inputs to key activities at National Nuclear Security Administration laboratories. The capability developed by this research stands to improve activities that depend upon empirical data and evaluation models by aligning these with predictive theory.

The researchers extended the density functional theory (DFT) modeling method designed for electronic structure systems to strongly interacting many-fermion systems and real-time dynamics, creating a time-dependent superfluid local density approximation (TDSLDA). For the study reported, evaluating the theory amounted to solving ≈56,000 complex coupled nonlinear, time-dependent, three-dimensional partial differential equations for a 240Pu nucleus using a highly efficient parallelized graphic processing unit (GPU) code. The calculations required ≈1760 GPUs and 550 minutes total wall time on Titan, a Cray XK7 supercomputer located at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF).

Unlike other models that incorporate a nuclear energy density functional, the TDSLDA is the only theoretical framework that allows the nucleus to evolve non-adiabatically while including all known collective degrees of freedom. The potential and kinetic energies remain a continuous function of the nuclear shape with no restrictions.

"One notable discovery in using the framework was the time it takes a nucleus to descend to the scission configuration—timescales an order of magnitude greater than those predicted in existing literature," explained co-author Kenneth Roche, a scientist in PNNL's High Performance Computing Group and an Affiliate Associate Professor with the University of Washington, Department of Physics. "One might expect this slow evolution was due to viscosity, but the simulations suggest that many shape and pairing modes are excited, causing energy exchanges in the collective degrees of freedom."

In their article, the authors note that their method could be extended to two-body observables within the fission process, including mass and charge, and eventually, they may be able to introduce additional random aspects that will result in more detailed information.

Explore further: New territory in nuclear fission explored with ISOLDE

More information: Aurel Bulgac et al. Induced Fission of within a Real-Time Microscopic Framework , Physical Review Letters (2016). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.122504

Related Stories

New territory in nuclear fission explored with ISOLDE

January 17, 2011

An international collaboration led by the University of Leuven, Belgium, exploiting ISOLDE’s radioactive beams, has recently discovered an unexpected new type of asymmetric nuclear fission, which challenges current theories. ...

Modeling the bizarre: Quantum superfluids

June 23, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- More than 100 years since superconductivity was discovered, a comprehensive description for the behavior of a broad class of fundamental physical systems that exhibit the bizarre properties of superconductivity ...

Code speedup strengthens researchers' grasp of neutrons

August 18, 2015

Neutrons are notoriously slippery subatomic particles. On their own, they break down in a matter of minutes, but within the confines of the atom's nucleus, neutrons are a foundational piece of nearly all known types of matter ...

Dynamics of nuclear fission at low excitation energy

August 25, 2015

The mechanisms of nuclear fission, especially the origin of asymmetric mass division in the low-excitation region of U and Pu, are still not clear. There are many conflicting arguments to explain the experimental data, making ...

Numerical simulations shed new light on early universe

April 21, 2016

Innovative multidisciplinary research in nuclear and particle physics and cosmology has led to the development of a new, more accurate computer code to study the early universe. The code simulates conditions during the first ...

Recommended for you

Quantum filter has 20,000 Josephson junctions

May 3, 2016

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers at CSIRO Manufacturing, in Australia has created several test quantum filters with arrays having as many as 20,000 Josephson junctions. In their paper published in Superconductor Science ...

Quantum logical operations realized with single photons

May 3, 2016

Scientists from all over the world are working on concepts for future quantum computers and their experimental realization. Commonly, a typical quantum computer is considered to be based on a network of quantum particles ...

Is it possible to cry a river?

May 3, 2016

With Tottenham's dreams of Premier League glory shattered before their very eyes by a 2-2 draw at Stamford Bridge, University of Leicester students research whether it is possible to really cry a river.

11 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gkam
1 / 5 (9) May 02, 2016
Give it up.

We have toyed with this dangerous stuff for over 60 years, and have produced nasty waste we cannot even store safely.

Time to end it and to clean up the messes we have made. But where and how do you keep it?
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (4) May 02, 2016
Getting closer to the hole. Try looking at high speed protons as they disrupt the outer shell of an atom and the neutron instabilities in the nucleus. Suggest we throw out the standard model. Might speed up your simulation, i.e. fewer processes. juz say'n
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (3) May 02, 2016
What we call waste is unused material! That is, a reaction without controls! I standfast that Modern Physics is ??
WhatTheFlux
4.3 / 5 (6) May 02, 2016
gkam -

Nuclear waste is wasted fuel. And storage is a political problem, not a scientific or engineering problem.

If you really hate the waste, you should be advocating for Gen-4 reactors that can use it as fuel. Because there's only two things you can do with long-term TRUs - bury it for a zillion years, or fission it down into short-lived FPs, the residue of which becomes virtually benign in about 300 years.

And any civilization that can't figure out how to safely store the residue for 300 years should pack it in and go back to horses and buggies. Which could actually work - if we got rid of about 6 billion people.

In lieu of that, let's push forward and use the stuff to generate gigawatts of clean electricity.

WhatTheFlux
4.2 / 5 (5) May 02, 2016
gkam -

Nuclear waste is wasted fuel. And storage is a political problem, not a scientific or engineering problem.

If you really hate the waste, you should be advocating for Gen-4 reactors that can use it as fuel. Because there's only two things you can do with long-term TRU waste - bury it for a zillion years, or fission it down into short-lived FPs, the residue of which becomes virtually benign in about 300 years.

And any civilization that can't figure out how to safely store the residue for 300 years should pack it in and go back to horses and buggies. Which could actually work - if we got rid of about 6 billion people.

In lieu of that, let's push forward and use the stuff to generate gigawatts of clean electricity.

gkam
1 / 5 (6) May 02, 2016
WTFlux, we have heard it before. I am 71, and have seen too many of these schemes which will save us. Nope. Time ran out already. If you can build one, good luck, but do not believe it will solve any problems.
gkam
1 / 5 (6) May 02, 2016
Flux, I hope you are right, but do not want to see us go down another radioactive Road To Nowhere.
WillieWard
1 / 5 (2) May 02, 2016
I am 71, and have seen too many of these schemes which will save us.
please, a tin foil hat for gskam
https://fsmedia.i...amp;q=75
http://static1.bu...ment.jpg
https://static.sp...-hat.jpg
gkam
1 / 5 (6) May 02, 2016
You nuke-lovers are the ones who need the shielding!

3,000,000-degree Neutrons need lots of shielding, Willie, so lay on the lead for your hat.
deleteme
3 / 5 (2) May 03, 2016
flux: after fukushimas nuclear incident, Chernobyl and 3 mile island, you still believe nuclear power is safe? Evolution took place over millions of years buddy. We adapted to potassium and several radioactive elements over MILLIONS of years. These man-made radioactive isotopes are brand-spanking new, and only an individual in denial would believe they're safe. Clearly, your deep-seated trust in nuclear power believes evolution can adapt to it in a day. We're lollygaggin with our genes; for-truck-sake man. Clearly we adapted to plagues and such, but detaching our DNAS histones like dissolving salt in water? This aint no ion-dipole interaction.
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) 13 hours ago
OK, so maybe we are doing it wrong. Not sure we know that we can or we can't modulate the fields to define better results and better controls. Juz say'n I like my block diagram for using nuclear power. Go with what we know. Most is this is escaping neutrons, few proton collisions, electrons scatter. Maybe we can define the path of ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.